By David Bradshaw
This concise spouse bargains an leading edge method of realizing the Modernist literary brain in Britain, targeting the highbrow and cultural contexts, which formed it. deals an cutting edge method of realizing the Modernist literary brain in Britain. is helping readers to know the highbrow and cultural contexts of literary Modernism. Organised round modern rules corresponding to Freudianism and eugenics instead of literary genres. Relates literary Modernism to the overarching problems with the interval, similar to feminism, imperialism and warfare.
Read or Download A Concise Companion to Modernism (Concise Companions to Literature and Culture) PDF
Best modernism books
This examine provides a brand new account of the relation among modernism and occult discourses. whereas modernism’s engagement with the occult has been approached through critics because the results of a lack of religion in illustration, an try to draw on technological know-how because the fundamental discourse of modernity, or as an try to draw on a hidden background of rules, Leigh Wilson argues that those discourses have at their middle a mystical perform which remakes the connection among global and illustration.
With the book of this ebook, Charles Tomlinson's version of Williams's chosen Poems, New instructions has brought a meeting higher and extra complete than the unique 1963 variation. starting with Professor Tomlinson's fantastically transparent and necessary creation this feature displays the main updated Williams scholarship.
Just like the earthquakes and explorations depicted at the covers of Gertrude Stein's notebooks, this learn responds to creative and linguistic fault strains and charts new territories. The author's hindrance is either with a normal theoretical query - the connection among portray and poetry, among the visible and the verbal - and with a particular interval of inventive historical past - the early years of the 20th century, while Cubism flourished.
- Libertinage in Russian Culture and Literature
- The Absence of God in Modernist Literature
- Modernism and Theory: A Critical Debate
- A Companion to Spanish American Modernismo (Monografías A)
Extra resources for A Concise Companion to Modernism (Concise Companions to Literature and Culture)
Evadne, the heroine of Sarah Grand’s sensational bestseller of 1893, The Heavenly Twins, bans the romantic novel from her reading, feasting instead on medical textbooks, which would impart the facts of life frankly and honestly. Among the books Evadne reads are the works of Galton, and Spencer (1893: 176). The Heavenly Twins sold 20,000 copies in Britain within a few weeks, and more than five times as many copies in the USA (Kersley 1983: 72–3). Even Tess was being used for sex education; Hardy reported that numerous mothers “tell me they are putting Tess into their daughters’ hands to safeguard their future” (Hardy 1978–88, I: 255).
Unlike many of his eugenic-minded contemporaries, Hardy would question the morality of the Spencerian dictum “survival of the fittest” (Arabella survives, in Jude the Obscure, but in what way is she fit? And, to complicate matters, her child is a morbid degenerate, suicidal and murderous, a product, par excellence, of Max Nordau’s worst fears). In 1876 he copied into his notebooks a passage from Theodore Watts-Dunton: “science tells us that, in the struggle for life, the surviving organism is not necessarily that which is absolutely best in an ideal sense, though it must be that which is most in harmony with the surrounding conditions” (1985, I: 40).
The ultimate aim of both was the attainment of a future society in which the egos of individuals would merge in the interests of the whole; an idea which would become a central tenet of eugenics. Thomas Huxley, by contrast, saw human nature, given the slowness of evolutionary change, as more or less fixed; for him, improvements were to be sought in the environment. He questioned the “unfortunate ambiguity of the phrase ‘survival of the fittest,’” remarking: “I sometimes won13 Angelique Richardson der whether people, who talk so freely about extirpating the unfit, ever dispassionately consider their own history” (1894: 80).